Skip to content
RentCharter
Methodology

How RentCharter estimates a fair local rent.

We show every tenant the same thing the First-tier Tribunal looks at: a comparison between the proposed rent and the local open-market range for similar properties. This page explains exactly how we build that comparison, what we don't do, and where the numbers come from.

Last updated May 2026.

Data sources

The market-rent comparison is calibrated to two publicly available UK datasets, both of which are used by housing officers, tribunals and local-authority strategy teams:

How a single check works

When you enter a postcode, property type and bedroom count, we resolve a comparison in this order:

  1. Postcode prefix match. We take the first part of the postcode (e.g. E8, SW2, M14) and look up the local-authority VOA series for that area, filtered to your property type and bedroom count.
  2. Local-authority fallback. If we can't resolve the postcode prefix cleanly, we fall back to the local authority implied by the postcode and use its VOA summary statistics for the same property type and bedroom count.
  3. Regional fallback. If neither lookup returns a usable sample, we fall back to the relevant ONS regional rent for the property type. We label this on the result so you know it's a regional rather than postcode-level comparison.

The output is a three-figure range — lower quartile, median, upper quartile — for properties of your type in your area. Your proposed rent is then placed on that range and classified into one of four bands: below market, around market, at the top of the market or above market.

Update cadence

The ONS publishes the Private Rental Market Statistics monthly. The VOA refreshes its local-authority private rents publication quarterly. We pull the latest published vintage into RentCharter within a calendar week of each publication. Every result page shows the publication date of the underlying data so you can confirm how current it is.

What this is not

Showing uncertainty

Every comparison comes with a confidence label that reflects:

A “low confidence” label doesn't mean the result is wrong — it means the underlying public sample is thin (typically rural local authorities or rare property types). In those cases, tribunal-grade evidence usually comes from agent-supplied comparables rather than published statistics, and we say so.

What we plan to add

The roadmap is open. The current priority list:

Audit and reproducibility

Every check produces an evidence pack. The pack shows the underlying comparison range, the publication date of the data, the lookup method we used, and the confidence label. If you challenge a rent to the First-tier Tribunal, that pack is what you attach — and any surveyor or tribunal member can re-derive the comparison from the same public source data.

Questions, corrections, suggestions

If you spot something wrong or you'd like to suggest a methodological improvement, write to elliot@rentcharter.org.

Run a free rent check